Administration's guidance aimed at dismantling Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in schools and colleges is halted by a court ruling.
In a significant legal battle, a U.S. District Judge in Maryland has struck down two Trump administration actions aimed at eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs at schools and universities. The ruling, which followed a motion for summary judgment from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, marks a setback for the administration's efforts to curtail DEI initiatives.
The conflict began with memos issued by the administration, which aimed to scrap diversity, equity, and inclusion programs at educational institutions. The Education Department was accused of violating the law when it threatened to cut federal funding from schools that continued with DEI initiatives.
Judge Stephanie Gallagher, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, wrote that the memos caused millions of educators to reasonably fear that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their schools to be punished. She took no view on whether the policies were "good or bad, prudent or foolish, fair or unfair."
The memos were part of the administration's war on education, according to Skye Perryman, the president and CEO of the American Federation of Teachers. The ruling comes as a relief to educators who had been subjected to unclear and highly subjective limits on their speech and association.
As of August 2025, the Trump administration's anti-DEI measures in schools and universities remain significantly challenged and partly blocked by multiple court rulings. In February 2025, a federal judge in Maryland issued a nationwide preliminary injunction blocking major components of Trump’s executive orders that sought to prohibit DEI initiatives. In August 2025, another federal judge halted the U.S. Department of Education’s actions aimed at withholding federal funding from schools maintaining race-based DEI programming.
Parallel litigation in other states also blocked funding cuts to public schools that continue DEI programs, citing First Amendment and viewpoint discrimination concerns. Despite these judicial setbacks, the administration has persisted with its anti-DEI approach in federal contracting and grant funding.
Most recently, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the administration to proceed with cutting nearly $800 million in NIH research funding as part of its anti-DEI push, though it blocked some future funding restrictions. This decision marked a significant partial victory for the administration’s policies related to research funding and DEI.
In summary, while court rulings as of mid-2025 have halted and paused many Trump administration efforts to curtail DEI initiatives in education, especially in K–12 schools, certain anti-DEI measures—particularly regarding federal contracting and NIH research funding—remain in effect or have been partially reinstated due to Supreme Court decisions, leaving the legal and policy landscape unsettled and actively contested.
The Trump administration's memos, responsible for challenging diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs at educational institutions, face opposition in both the court system and general news. The American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, among others, have been vocally critical of these policies in the realm of politics, advocating for the protection and preservation of DEI initiatives in education and self-development.
%20initiatives%20in%20schools%20and%20colleges%20is%20halted%20by%20a%20court%20ruling.){kind=link}