Skip to content

Discordant Understanding Gap Unearthed

Economic success hinges on knowledge acquisition. Technology, novelty, and manufacturing techniques stem from learning how to produce goods and services that boost our wealth. Knowledge is essentially an "open-source" commodity: fresh concepts can better countless lives; and as long as...

Essential Knowledge Fuels Economic Growth: Technology, creativity, and smarts stem from acquiring...
Essential Knowledge Fuels Economic Growth: Technology, creativity, and smarts stem from acquiring novel methods to generate wealth-enhancing goods and services. Knowledge, being the classical "common asset," offers benefits to all; fresh thoughts can advantage anyone, and utilization doesn't decrease accessibility unless restricted by governments or monopolies. This is particularly significant [...]

Discordant Understanding Gap Unearthed

Yo, here's the deal: Knowledge is like the golden ticket to economic growth. You get new techniques, tech, and ideas through learning, and that's how we create more goods and services that make our lives better. Now, here's the kicker - knowledge is a public good, meaning it can benefit everyone, and using it doesn't make it any less available.

But here's the catch: context matters! Any mismatch between how ideas are created and the specific conditions they're applied to can seriously decrease the value of gaining that knowledge.

For instance, corn is grown all over the world, but different areas have different environmental threats. So, research and development have mainly focused on North American and European pests. That means there are bunches of biotech patents for these pests, but only a few for those that affect Sub-Saharan Africa.

Two economists, Jacob Moscona and Karthik Sastry from Harvard, say this technology mismatch can hold back agricultural-productivity growth in poorer regions. In fact, according to their analysis, this mismatch alone can account for 15% of the global difference in agricultural productivity.

Now, let's talk about inappropriate technologies in low-income countries. It's like rich countries giving us an old, busted cellphone when we really need the latest smartphone. Tuberculosis diagnostics, for example, have lagged far behind diagnostics for rich-country diseases. When COVID-19 hit, hundreds of tests became available in just months, but it took over a century to achieve comparable progress with TB. Plus, advanced TB diagnostics still require trained technicians and a steady electricity supply, which might not be available in lower-income settings.

There's also a problem with technologies that favor certain groups over others. Automation and digital tech might enhance productivity overall, but they can make life tough on many workers, especially those without higher education. This can create a huge redistributive effect, which can outweigh the overall productivity gains.

Cultural norms and practices can also create a mismatch. For instance, certain African communities that were heavily affected by slave traders developed a deep mistrust of outsiders, which isn't ideal for building a strong economy in today's globalized world. Similarly, American resistance to redistribution might be rooted in past economic mobility, rather than current realities.

All in all, these mismatches need to be tackled if knowledge is going to benefit a society. Awareness campaigns could redirect innovation toward workers, and policies should prioritize the voices of relevant stakeholders like workers or poor countries to avoid the adoption of inappropriate technologies. Lastly, countries should remember that it's not just any knowledge that's powerful, but knowledge that's useful for their unique situation.

  1. Knowledge, with its potential to drive economic growth, is a valuable public good, providing new techniques, technology, and ideas that contribute to the production of goods and services.
  2. Contextual compatibility plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of knowledge, potential mismatches reducing the value of gained knowledge, such as in agricultural research focused on North American and European pests and negligence of Sub-Saharan Africa.
  3. Jacob Moscona and Karthik Sastry, economists from Harvard, argue that tech mismatch can impede agricultural productivity growth in poorer regions, with their analysis showing that it alone could account for 15% of the global difference in agricultural productivity.
  4. In low-income countries, the application of inappropriate technologies can be detrimental, likening it to donating an old cellphone instead of a modern smartphone, as seen in tuberculosis diagnostics which lag behind those for rich-country diseases.
  5. Technological advancements can exacerbate income inequality, affecting workers without higher education most, as automation and digital technology enhance productivity but may displace workers and widen the wealth gap.
  6. Cultural norms and practices can serve as mismatches, such as the mistrust of outsiders in certain African communities that have a history of slave trading, hindering economic development in today's globalized world.
  7. Policies should be tailored to prioritize the voices of relevant stakeholders, like workers, and promote innovation that benefits the broader population, especially those in low-income settings.
  8. Awareness campaigns and education-and-self-development resources should emphasize the importance of relevant and applicable knowledge to avoid the adoption of outdated or inappropriate technologies.
  9. Lastly, as no single knowledge is universally powerful, nations should strive to foster a knowledge economy that caters to their unique circumstances and specific development needs.

Read also:

    Latest